Login or Register

  Welcome: Guest


Home >> Article >> Arts & Humanities >> People >> Post New Article Bookmark and Share

Why Tolstoy was denied the Nobel Prize

December 29, 2011  by: Jay  Points: 12   Category: People  Earning $0.35   Views: 634

Learn why some of the most eminent personalities did not get the Nobel Prizes they deserved. What went on behind the scenes? Why Tolstoy did not got the prize. How Winston Churchill got the Prize. How Albert Einstein was belittled and so on. Learn all what you can in this series titled Victims of the Nobel Prizes

         

Victims of Nobel Prizes

Learn why some of the most eminent personalities did not get the Nobel Prizes they deserved. What went on behind the scenes? Why Tolstoy did not got the prize. How Winston Churchill got the Prize. How Albert Einstein was belittled and so on.

Learn all what you can in this series titled Victims of the Nobel Prizes

Are Nobel Prize Judges the wisest of the wisest or mere mortals?
Every year, the Nobel Prizes are awarded. But one cannot understand the hype it generates. Is it because the laureates created a work of distinction that supposedly confers 'the greatest benefit to mankind'?

If so the members of the Nobel Prize Committee must be endowed with godly wisdom so as to decide what constitutes the 'greatest work'.

Are they? May be! But here are some of the famous cases dug up from history that suggest otherwise.

If a curious mind penetrates behind the scene, he will learn that the judges or members of the Selection Committee of the Nobel Prizes are mere mortals filled with high-flying vanities, prejudices, petty rivalries, frailties all perfectly blended with intelligence, honesty wisdom and courage.

Alfred Bernhard Nobel {1833-1896} virtually opened the floodgates of controversies and congratulations by unintentionally [or deliberately?] omitting in his WILL the yardsticks to measure what constitutes 'the greatest work'.

On 10th December 1901, the first crowning ceremony started off with a bang with five distinguished persons winning the Prize, but the bang did emanate some jarring notes that was to be heard for many long years to come.


Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy 1828-1910

Tolstoy authored War and Peace and Anna Karenina which were acknowledged as the greatest works of realist fiction.

Why Tolstoy was denied the Nobel Prize
When Sully Prudhomme {1839-1907}, a French poet was selected and awarded the Nobel Prize by Swedish Academy for his literary works that interpreted the conflict between emotions and reason, the world opinion protested. Not because Prudhomme got the Prize, but Tolstoy was ignored; and to this effect 42 scientists and artists signed a tribute to the slighted celebrity {Tolstoy} in protest against the Academy's indifference to Tolstoy.

Yet the Swedish Academy did not consider him even for 1902 Literary Prize. Thanks to Swede's only literary expert of the time, Carl David af Wirsen {1842-1912 the Academy's Permanent Secretary and Chairman, Nobel Committee for literature whose verdict put out all hopes of Tolstoy ever winning the Prize.

Carl David af Wirsen opined, "'War and Peace' and 'Annakerenina' deserved the Prize. while his religious sociological and political writings were regarded as both immature and misleading. he has condemned all forms of civilization and urged instead a primitive mode of life divorced from all forms of higher culture. though completely inexperienced in Biblical criticism he has ambitiously rewritten the New Testament in a half-rationalistic, half-mystical spirit confronted by much expressions of narrow minded hostility to all forms of civilization, one feels dubious. One does not like to bestow recognition. it would be wrong to force on the great writer such a reward."

Having read the Chairman Wirsen's report what one would say but sigh in vain?!?

Even Maxim Gorky's famous autobiography could have been 'placed in the front rank' for the Prize. But the Academy found it difficult to arrive at a wholly objective judgment as the intellectual part he had played during the revolution and his other works were 'politically colored'.

Judging literary merits on political colors! Truly, this is not one of the main stipulations in Nobel's WILL. That explains why the Russians did not get even one Prize for the first 50 years until World War II in all the faculties except for minor writer Ivan Bunin {1870-1953; 1933} and Ivan Petrovic Pavlov {1849-1936; 1904} for literature and physiology respectively.

Likewise, since the initiation of the Nobel Prizes in 1901, there were several instances where so many deserving celebrated personalities suffered victimization and were denied the Prize.

The 2011 Nobel Prize in Literature
The 2011 Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to Tomas Tranströmer of Sweden. The Prize motivation read as "because, through his condensed, translucent images, he gives us fresh access to reality".




Comment(s)

No response found. Be the first to respond to this post

Post Comment

Please Log In  to post comment

Related Resources



All Nobel prize winners in physics
In this resource the list of all Nobel prize winners in physics is given.

All Nobel prize winners in chemistry
In this resourse the list of nobel prize winners in chemistry is given.

All Nobel Prize winners in Medicine
In this resource the list of all Nobel prize winners in medicine is given.

All Nobel prize winners in Literature
In this resource the list all Nobel prize winners in Literature is given.

All Nobel Peace prize winners
In this resource the list of all Nobel peace prize winners is given.

Latest Resources From The Same Category



Relations these Days are Created, for Selfish Motive and Broken, for Selfish Motive
There is new trend these days that relations are created, for selfish motive and also broken, for selfish motives. Value given, just to fact that if a relation is full filling selfish motive; then it must be made, at any cost; but if, it is not full filling selfish motive; then it must be broken, at any cost.

Love is Time Pass for some Selfish People
Earlier, it was said that fewer people are lucky who get their love.

Rakhi is Void in Mind of Certain Selfish Brothers and Sisters
Yes, it is true that Rakhi is void in mind of certain brothers and sisters; who does not mean its true meaning from heart. Instead, they have just one sided meaning of their own; opposite from true meaning of Rakhi festival.

Lifes Great Lessons
We can never take anything or anyone for granted in life ...

Blaming to whom!!!
The article is all about the past time of cast division and it consequences''''

 

Top Performers     Top Contributors     Share and Earn     Terms of Service    Privacy Policy     Contact Us